Where you run into problems is when the authors know the story they want to tell before they collect the data and then try to jam those data into that framework. If you want your writing to be effective, become a writer. Characters should not, conversely, serve as pawns for some plot youve dreamed up.
Such cases are rare, but they do occur, and the bigger the operation, the bigger the needs. But the person really responsible, as she is for most of the best things in my life, is my wife, Gwen.
Corresponding author: Jin Wook Kim. But, we do write papers with an Introduction and a Discussion, and we do read Origin of Species.
As I noted, the actual editorial costs are frequently minimal, because we rely mostly on volunteers to serve as reviewers and even as the associate editors who handle a paper or two a month. Instead, I target scientistsfrom students to working professionalswho are ready to go beyond the basics and become writers.
They grow in their ability to perform with style and power, whether that be to create wooden chairs, legal arguments, life-saving surgeries, or scientific papers that become classics.We also wouldnt read Charles Darwins Origin of Species; instead, we would read his notebooks and get the raw data. But this terminology can be deceptive, if not downright dishonest. This is not a prolonged tirade of a high minded literary scholar nitpicking grammatical errors. The examples I hold up as good practice, I use intact and cite properly, though I remove the reference citations to make them easier to read. These men and women not only think more deeply and creatively than most of us, they also are able to communicate their thinking in ways that make it easy to assimilate. Its insights and strategies will equip science students, scientists, and professionals across a wide range of scientific and technical fields with the tools needed to communicate effectively. The rule in these discussions should be that you may not discuss the scientific content unless it is directly germane to evaluating the writing. This sharp little maxim may appear logical, but it is really rubbish. Success is defined not by the number of pages you have in print but by their influence. The alternative, when authors pay only if their articles are accepted, creates different dilemmas.