Plato ring of gyges

This proves, to his satisfaction, that people act justly only under compulsion. Now the shepherds met together, according to custom, that they might send their monthly report about the flocks to the king; into their assembly he came having the ring on his finger, and as he was sitting among them he chanced to turn the collet of the ring inside his hand, when instantly he became invisible to the rest of the company and they began to speak of him as if he were no longer present.

He acted violently on the power gained from the ring.

What did the ring of gyges do for the person who wore it?

Outlawing online anonymity will not do anything to deter harmful activities such as scams, doxing , and making threats. Arriving at the palace, he used his new power of invisibility to seduce the queen, and with her help he murdered the king, and became king of Lydia himself. The question "What is Justice? As people grow more and more confident in their ability to speak out and act upon hatred, there will be more confidence in sharing things publicly. The legends[ edit ] Gyges of Lydia was a historical king, the founder of the Mermnad dynasty of Lydian kings. In Glaucon 's recounting of the myth, an unnamed ancestor of Gyges [4] was a shepherd in the service of the ruler of Lydia. Whereupon he contrived to be chosen one of the messengers who were sent to the court; where as soon as he arrived he seduced the queen, and with her help conspired against the king and slew him, and took the kingdom. The role of the legend in Republic[ edit ] In Republic, the tale of the ring of Gyges is described by the character of Glaucon who is the brother of Plato. Through his invisibility he seduces a queen, kills her king, and takes over the kingdom. This piece is particularly useful as an instance of how ancient philosophy remains relevant. Are we inherently compassionate? He is further to be blessed with wealth, companions, and an unblemished though false reputation for justice.

Glaucon posits: Suppose now that there were two such magic rings, and the just put on one of them and the unjust the other; no man can be imagined to be of such an iron nature that he would stand fast in justice. Glaucon begins by asserting that people find it desirable or good to inflict wrongdoings on others but these wrongdoers regarded being on the receiving end of misdeeds as undesirable.

ring of gyges youtube

And for that reason, we cannot outlaw anonymity because it is merely a blanket solution to a deeper and more complex issue. The story he tells acts as a thought-experiment.

I believe that it does not take anonymity to be unjust. If you could imagine any one obtaining this power of becoming invisible, and never doing any wrong or touching what was another's, he would be thought by the lookers-on to be a most wretched idiot, although they would praise him to one another's faces, and keep up appearances with one another from a fear that they too might suffer injustice.

If Plato's allegory of the ring is right, then we had better watch out. As people grow more and more confident in their ability to speak out and act upon hatred, there will be more confidence in sharing things publicly.

Rated 5/10 based on 5 review
Summary of Plato’s Ring of Gyges